No worries. We have some true talent, and an impressive coaching staff. I haven’t bet on sports in decades, but I’m REALLY tempted to bet our over. Man, do I wish we had a few real LBers!
I don’t guess I’m too surprised, but that’s still very disheartening. I’m convinced we’re better than that, but this schedule will make it awfully hard to prove. Heck, we could go 0-10 & still be better than many teams. Just no one would believe it.
Which is a very good reason to be skeptical of such a ranking. Unless Ar St is much much better than it has been historically, they’re just not better than many P5 teams. To my knowledge they’ve won exactly one game against a P5 opponent. Against a bad TAMU about 15-20 years ago. And it’s not like they’re coming off a 10-2 season with big wins & close losses to good teams. They did win their bowl game against a G5 program last year, but that was about it.
I’m not going to say we’re a better team than they are right now. A team that got blown out by N. TX & WKU over the past 2 years can’t claim to be better than anyone. However, I think our talent is better than it has shown under what was perhaps the most inept coaching in college football. The coaching staff is new & I believe is SEC caliber. We desperately need an SEC win.
Thanks for that info, Matt. I didn’t know those stats, but I can’t imagine ASU has made the kind of leap from that history to be a top 33 team this year. USA today apparently fails to adequately consider the quality of opponents a team plays.
I’d be interested to know if this is a reflection of a panel of USA Today reporters, or just Paul Myerberg’s opinion. The methodology isn’t explained.
It’s not uncommon for a single voice to be passed as the opinion of a news organization. For instance, when Baseball America rated Baum Stadium the best college ballpark a couple of years ago, it was actually just the opinion of its lead college baseball writer, Teddy Cahill.