Positing the ADG’s treatment of the University of Arkansas at Fayetteville is a real problem, amidst all of the other problems up on the Hill, demonstrates a high level of cluelessness. Very few care about this.
WINNING! Someone up there needs to start caring about that. And in today’s case, WINNING PRETTY over an inferior opponent.
I’m not equating a direct 100 percent correlation to recruiting in the time the paper has chosen to demean the U.
I am suggesting a minimizing effect over time to the stature of the primary state program which has been a state brand.
Mimizing it to an equal of UA Fayetteville to UA Monticello or whatever is something you would not see at U of Texas or Ohio State etc.
No question this is a small thing today in light of coaching and AD potential changes.
I just can’t help but wonder whether stadium debates or a state paper minimizing state program brand, the things that are done rightly or wrongly that perpetuate perception that U of A is not a national player.