So it was functionally an inadvertent whistle

it is an awful mistake that is functionally not correctable, but in my opinion ( I did ref long ago to get through grad school and make money undergrad) it was not proprerly enforced. When the whistle blew, it should then be Auburn’s ball where it was and not where the ball was spiked. May not be much, but 5 yards further back and maybe the FG drifts wide anyway.

If there is an inadvertent whistle while the ball is loose following a fumble by A1 beyond the neutral zone, the ball is awarded to the fumbling team at the spot where the ball was when the whistle blew with no choice of replaying the down.

The number of officiating mistakes cannot be reconciled, apologized or explained away. However, what is the purpose of Charlotte replay if they cannot get it right for the on field miscreants?

1 Like

Not an official, nor have I officiated, but I’m watching College Football Final. They actually spoke to a NCAA rules expert (not the two NFL guys that were on ESPN, but an actual college official). He said that the officials try to give the QB the benefit of the doubt with the spike (hence it being ruled intentional grounding). BUT, he also said it was backwards, was a fumble and a “CLEAR” Arkansas recovery. I want to see if the SEC will admit it screwed up.

1 Like

Two NFL referees, one of which has overseen and guided multiple college conferences and officiated multiple super bowls said that given video review they should’ve awarded the ball to Arkansas.

I’ll go with their interpretation.

The SEC will not admit mistakes were made because they fully intend to continue to allow such mistakes in the future to be made to protect what they perceive to be the better team.

Just posted about that

Of course they didn’t.

This topic was automatically closed after 30 days. New replies are no longer allowed.