Interesting take.
<LINK_TEXT text="http://www.espn.com/blog/sec/post//id/ … razorbacks">http://www.espn.com/blog/sec/post//id/119562/sec-qb-breakdown-arkansas-razorbacks</LINK_TEXT>
If grade of C is assigned primarily on the total inexperience of our QBs, though they were 4 stars in recruiting and have been here awhile, then would you expect Bama’s grade for QBs to be higher? Their’s have not had meaningful experience either. Bama hasn’t even chosen a starter yet; to hear Saban speak of them, they are all too inconsistent as yet.
They should not be graded higher than ours.
They are, but not much. Bateman has a little more experience than AA, and that seems to be the difference:
<LINK_TEXT text="http://www.espn.com/blog/sec/post//id/ … imson-tide">http://www.espn.com/blog/sec/post//id/119594/sec-qb-breakdown-alabama-crimson-tide</LINK_TEXT>
That might make sense if Alabama’s starting quarterback had won the job on merit rather than being the least worst. They have had problems getting anybody to stand out.